Why is there often confusion with respect to how consumers and insurers define no-fault? | insurers define no-fault as the insured recovers from them after a loss whereas consumers think it relates to whether their premiums increase |
What TWO (2) distinctions must be made when considering no-fault concepts? | vehicle damage and injuries must be considered separately. |
What early agreements used the original concept of no-fault automobile insurance? | "knock for knock" agreements. each insurer paid for repairs to its own policyholders regardless of who was at fault. |
What are the aims of no-fault automobile insurance? | 1. less investigation 2. less subrogation activity. 3. less litigation 4. speedier settlements for insureds 5. insureds deal only with their own insurer 6. costs savings which result in lower premiums. |
How is fault determined for premium chargeability in Quebec? In Ontario? In New Brunswick? | Quebec - driver's fault chart Ontario/NB - fault determination rules |
To which type of automobile insurance coverage was the no-fault concept first applied in Canada? | no-fault concepts were first applied towards injuries. |
What auto policy coverages are the forerunners of present day no-fault plans? | accidents benefits coverage evolved from medical expense coverage from the 1940s. |
What is a "threshold" as it relates to auto insurance? | it is the degree of injury a claimant must establish before being allowed to commence a legal action against the responsible party |
What provinces presently have no-fault plans? | Quebec, Manitoba and Saskatchwan. Ontario has a threshold no-fault plan |
What provinces allow no suits for injury? | Quebec and Manitoba have completely banned lawsuits |
What provinces allow suits in certain circumstances only? | Ontario allows conditionally lawsuits for injured parties. |
No comments:
Post a Comment